Monday, February 14, 2022

Who is Q (as posted on the THC forum)

 I'm listening to the fourth (and final) interview with Tracy Twyman on THC.  I've previously listened to the prior interviews, and I've listened to Tyman promoting Genuflect on FreemanTV's podcast.  Right now, she's discussing the Q phenomenon with Greg in a very esoteric and intriguing light.  Rest in Peace to Twyman.  It's unfortunate we'll probably never get that 'next book' she was talking about, but I'll definitely have to read Genuflect, now.  

I followed the Q phenomenon for a while when it began to poke its head up after the Las Vegas Route 66 massacre and the ascent of Trump to the Presidency.  Towards the end of the Trump presidency I 'figured out' that Q was Ezra Cohen-Watnick (ECW), but probably also consisted of other topish-level Trump Admin. personnel, such as Dan Scavino and General Mike Flynn.  ECW (a Jew) had, as I see it, fellow Jewish journalist run cover for him after it seemed apparent that Trump would not be sworn into public office again in 2020.  Mike Flynn has also publicly denounced Q, but I don't necessarily think that exonerates them from suspicion of being part of this Q group (I don't think Q was one individual, obviously, nor is the premise that it was a 'larp', perpetuated by basement-dwelling troll(s), doesn't carry much water for me, either).  

The alt-right was promoting Operation Trust theories (relating to what Q really was) later into the Trump Presidency, as well, since Trump is/was clearly Zionist and state of Israel-beholden, and the alt-right lost favor with Trump fairly early on, despite his candidacy being a rallying point in 2016 timeframe, and probably even helped spur on the alt-right as a subcultural populist movement (albeit one that admittedly is a predominantly online one).  

God help me, I still sometimes pay attention to X-22 Report, and I see on Trending Bitchute that boomer-tier Q/MAGA true believers are still going strong in some circles that milieu of the conspiratorium.  I see that John Durham (supposedly a Q/Trump ally that had been mentioned when Q was 'posting' to 8chan  [8kun, whatever...the Q posting began on 4chan's /pol/ board, I believe, but transitioned to a more MAGA-friendly online space {8chan, 8kun, 4chan, Endchan: What you need to know}]) is in the (mainstream) headlines again and is gaining some popularity traction in (4chan) /pol/ thread posts in recent days.  Obviously, there is a lot (more) skepticism with regards to Q, 'trusting the Plan', MAGA, etc. post the January 6th fiasco, in particular.  HBO even did a goddamned documentary on Q, as we probably all well know if we're conspiracy junkies and posting or reading anything on the THC forum.  

Anyhow, what's your view on Q, if any?  Am I off about ECW, et al collaborators?  Is Q 'finished', or does the phenomenon have any kind of limited 'comeback', as perhaps Durham's investigation into Russiagate and the HRC server and possibly other crimes might indicate?  Is 'Q' good faith or bad?  I think Q is inherently multicultural and diverse civic nationalism/Americanism, and a lot in the alt or dissident right are not going to like Q for that reason in particular, and the fact that ECW is a Jew does not endear him to the white nationalism crowd or folks with a more 'pro-white' and return to tradition mindset.  Still, politically and/or conspiratorially speaking, I'm not sure if the book has been closed on the Q narrative just yet.  The 2020's seem to be full of promise for a bumpy ride, so let's all just buckle-up and brace for impact, because 'the ride never ends...', as they say...



Saturday, August 28, 2021

Smallstorm on THC

 THComment

I remember being impressed and sharing Smallstorm’s Unravelling Sandy Hook (and especially the beginning part). I’ve never watched any of the full documentaries on Sandy Hook from the conspiratorial perspective, like We Need to Talk About Sandy Hook or Wolfgang Halbig‘s work. Like with Big, Capstone Events like 9/11, I haven’t delved into everything on that topic, but I’ve gotten enough to get a gestalt of High Dubiousness of the official story(ies).
At any rate, I wouldn’t mind more episodes on Sandy Hook in particular. I’m sure, as we approach the 20th anniversary of 9/11, Greg and the rest of the conspiracy and dissident media platforms will have at least some content or commentary on what 9/11 was or is to them (I’m sure Smallstorm has 9/11 viewpoints, as well).
I have admit a fair degree of ignorance in most major and even minor conspiracy events. My certainly open-to-review position on Sandy Hook for a while has been the kids were killed as part of a ritual, 2012 Mayan-esque sacrifice to feathered serpent god Quetzalcoatl. But then the kids also showed up at the Super Bowl singing later that year (clones or identical twins?!). And it was certainly all staged (and, as Smallstorm pointing out in ‘Unravelling’, there’s no way [I’m paraphrasing from memory] 90 lb soaking wet autistic and probable MK Ultra subject Adam Lanza could have achieved a near 100% accuracy with kill-to-ammunition spent, when trained special forces don’t come close to that ratio). Greg could do a 2 hour podcast just on Creepy Gene Rosen, I’m sure (Holy shit, this is real. I recall a parody video of the Monkee’s Sleepy Jean to Creepy Gene, but I can’t find it, now…).
There’s also that Fairfield Mental Hospital in close proximity to Sandy Hook I recall reading intrigue about (underground tunnels, etc.) on conspiracy forums. Was that whole fucking town a CIA stage?! Do you see how I might need a fresher analysis of the conspiratorial narrative and perhaps a more fact-based view on SH?

P.S.: 9/11 was Israel and Jews, and also a mass, occult ritual sacrifice (per the millennium beginning), and I’m definitely intrigued by Judy Wood‘s Hurricane Andrew and her directed, exotic energy weaponry narrative (or basement nukes or nano-thermite, yadda yadda, versus conventional E-Thing & Gelatin demolition wiring, a la Building 7). But the WTC towers debate is only ‘internecine squabbling’, according to James Corbett, so I’m willing to forego some of those more harder or impossible to prove speculations regarding 9/11.
The two towers being replaced by the One World Trade center kind of speaks for itself re: ritual theory:

Ryan Dawson‘s apparently done some good, Israelis-did-9/11 link content, but I’ve still to watch that, or even The New Pearl Harbor doc (I’m surprised that’s still on YouTube), or Who Killed John O’Neill, etc.!. I also should probably read The Looming Tower and familiarize myself more with Saudi intrigue and the official narrative, generally. Fwiw, Jane Mayer’s The Dark Side was an early-ish redpill for me vis-à-vis GWOT and renditions, etc., although I’m fairly certain it takes a conventional approach to the 9/11 events narrative in general. I participated in OIF, albeit to a small extent, but undoubtedly this primed me to be quite pissed regarding my nascent 9/11-related redpilling I was experiencing circa 2010-12, since it clearly conflicted with my motivations for said earlier participation(s).

P.P.S.: Looking forward to the Smallstorm interview!